"nPrinciplism, in general and Four Principles Approach in particular is largely discussed in current medical ethics.Accord­ing to principlism, the ethical relationship between physician and patient has to be categorized based on some princi­ples, the prin­ciples which are general, action-guiding and could help both the patient and the physician to arrange their ethical behav­ior.Four Principles Approach Biotin which is a principlistic view, has formulated the princi­ples which have to be considered in medi­cal ethics in the light of Rossian ethical framework as follows: respect for auton­omy, nonmalefi­cience, beneficence and jus­tice.
Ethical Particularism, on the other hand, strongly criticizes princi­plism and repudi­ates the very idea of generalizabil­ity in the realm of ethics.According to particularists, the way in which a mor­ally relevant feature like fidelity and justice be­have in different ethical occasions is fully con­text-dependent so that they can­not be patternable in advance.It follows from this that fidelity, for instance, is not a good-making feature, generally speak­ing.
"nIn this paper, firstly, the Rossian ethics is discussed in order to make Four Dining Room Package Principles Approach intelligible.Sec­ondly, the main particularists' argument against principlism is formulated.Finally, Particularists' argument is evalu­ated and its plau­si­bility is discussed.